按课堂已讲方向整理的课后复习改进版。本节课主要是多题思路讲解,逐字稿中没有完整成文定稿;以下保留课堂证据支持的写作框架和可朗读段落,不扩写未讲过的新立场。
Some people think students should be grouped according to academic ability, while others think students with different abilities should study together. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Grouping students by academic ability can help different learners receive more suitable teaching. Strong students may benefit from faster lessons, more challenging tasks and positive peer pressure. When they study with other high achievers, they are less likely to become too satisfied with their current performance. At the same time, underachieving students may also benefit from classes designed for their level, because teachers can slow down, explain basic ideas more clearly and help them gain confidence.
However, mixed-ability classes also have clear advantages. They may prevent serious polarization, where strong students become stronger and weaker students fall further behind. If students are separated too early, some classes may develop a poor learning atmosphere, and parents may have to spend more money on tutoring sessions or cramming schools. A balanced approach may therefore be the optimal solution. In the early stages, students can study together, but in the final exam-preparation stage, some level-based grouping may be useful. Ultimately, students' progress still depends on students themselves.
Some people think manufacturers and supermarkets should reduce the amount of packaging, while others think consumers should avoid buying products with too much packaging. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Manufacturers should take responsibility because they are the source of production. If they produce fewer over-packaged goods, fewer raw materials will be wasted and less pollution will be created from the beginning. Supermarkets and other sellers also play an important role. Sometimes products are packed beautifully not because the product itself needs it, but because attractive packaging can stimulate consumers to buy more. Sellers can offer simpler and cheaper options, so people who only need the product do not have to pay for unnecessary boxes or gift packages.
Consumers also have responsibility because their choices influence the whole supply chain. If fewer people buy over-packaged products, companies will have less reason to produce and sell them. This is also practical for consumers: they can simply choose products with less packaging, which may save both money and time. To resolve this problem, joint effort made by producers, sellers and consumers is required.
Some people think all law breakers should be sent to prison, while others believe there are better alternatives such as community work or skills training. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Prison has two important functions. First, it creates deterrence because losing freedom is a serious punishment, and this may stop potential criminals from breaking the law. Second, it creates incapacitation: once dangerous criminals are locked up, they cannot continue to harm society. This is especially important for murderers, serial killers and other serious offenders.
However, sending every law breaker to prison is not always wise. Prisons cost a large amount of public money, and petty criminals or juvenile offenders may learn more serious criminal methods if they are kept together with dangerous prisoners. Skills training can help some offenders stand on their own feet after release. If a person committed a crime because they could not earn a living, a practical skill may reduce the chance of reoffending. Still, this approach is not suitable for all criminals, especially those who deliberately choose crime for quick money or have already committed violent crimes. A combined approach is better: serious offenders should be imprisoned, while minor offenders can receive training, community work and strict supervision.
Some people think governments should subsidize fruit and vegetables to make healthy food more affordable, while others think governments should tax unhealthy food. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Subsidizing fruit and vegetables can make healthy food more affordable, especially for low-income families. It may improve people's diet and reduce the gap between rich and poor people in access to healthy food. However, this policy may also create a heavy burden on limited public funds. Organic fruit and vegetables are often expensive because they avoid chemical fertilisers, pesticides and herbicides, so long-term subsidies may cost the government a great deal of money.
Taxing unhealthy food can also be useful. If fast food or sugary products become more expensive, people may feel reluctant to consume them on a daily basis, so the frequency of unhealthy eating may decrease. However, this policy can also have side effects. Higher prices may reduce consumption, hurt related businesses and even lead to unemployment. Therefore, a combined but moderate approach may be optimal: governments can subsidize some basic healthy foods and levy reasonable taxes on extremely unhealthy products, without placing too much pressure on public funds or the economy.
In some countries, older people who need employment have to compete with younger people for the same jobs. What problems does this cause, and what are the solutions?
When older people compete with young people for jobs, young workers may face fewer opportunities. In labour-intensive jobs, some older people may accept lower pay because they have less pressure to raise children, which makes them cheaper for employers. In more skilled jobs, older workers may have more experience and stronger networks, so younger people may find it difficult to move up. This can reduce young people's motivation and may even lead to talent loss if they decide to move to other cities or countries.
Governments can address this problem mainly through policy and investment. One solution is to adjust retirement policies or increase the employment cost of hiring older workers in certain positions, for example through higher pension contributions. Another solution is to support new industries, especially high-tech industries, where younger people may have more opportunities and older workers may not have the same advantage in experience or networks.