练过的材料
- 寄宿学校 boarding school 题目:练习 positive trend 类题目的立场选择、理由排序和负面论证边界。
- 快时尚 fast fashion 题目:重点点评 Rice 同学作文思路,练习直接污染、间接污染和正反对应。
- 素食 vegetarian 题目:练习用科学细节支撑观点。
- 历史遗迹 historic sites 题目:练习先写经济收益,再写国家认同等精神价值。
- 博物馆文物归还题目:练习文化遗产类题目的双边思考和避免过度激进表达。
写作 · 2026-06-17
本节写作课围绕雅思大作文思路展开,重点训练理由排序、论证边界、正反对应逻辑和高分词汇表达。Rice同学的快时尚作文思路被老师重点表扬:具体、清楚,并且没有具体到失真。
课堂推进:老师先用寄宿学校 boarding school(寄宿学校)题目讲解:如果题目问某趋势是否积极,可以写“有好处,但不是积极趋势”,核心是说明弊大于利。
老师处理:老师解释 more and more 类趋势题可从“物极必反”的角度写弊大于利,并示范结论逻辑。
老师示范 / 修改方向:It may bring some benefits, but it should not be regarded as a positive trend because its disadvantages outweigh its advantages.
复习抓手:题目问 positive trend(积极趋势)时,可以写“有好处但整体不是好事”。;不是说完全没有好处,而是坏处比好处更多。;看到 more and more(越来越多)类趋势,可以优先考虑弊大于利。
课堂推进:老师提醒大家写理由时要先写最直接、最重要、最多人能感受到的理由,不要把教育话题拉到太远的环境污染角度。
老师处理:老师指出“寄宿学校减少接送从而减少环境污染”这个理由链条太远,建议改成节省 commuting(通勤)时间,并把时间用于补觉、学习或兴趣拓展。
学生原始输出:因为是寄宿学校所以就工作日不用车接车送于是就减少了环境污染
老师示范 / 修改方向:Boarding schools can save students a lot of commuting time, so they may use this time to rest, study, or develop extracurricular interests.
复习抓手:教育类话题优先写对学生学习和成长的影响。;commuting 是“通勤”,指从家到学校或工作地点的往返路程。;不要把教育题硬写成环境题,否则像套用语料。
课堂推进:老师继续说明,教育类话题除了写对孩子的影响,也可以写对家长、学校或社会的影响,但顺序上通常要先孩子后家长。
老师处理:老师肯定了“家长忙、没空照顾孩子,因此寄宿学校能减轻家长压力”的点,并补充 strike a balance between work and family(平衡工作和家庭)的表达。
学生原始输出:家长他很忙他也没空照顾自己的孩子
老师示范 / 修改方向:Parents may find it difficult to strike a balance between work and family, so boarding schools can reduce their childcare pressure.
复习抓手:strike a balance between work and family 表示“平衡工作和家庭”。;对家长的好处可以写,但通常放在对孩子的影响之后。;寄宿学校可能减少家长照顾孩子的时间压力。
课堂推进:老师强调,写教育类坏处时也应先写对孩子的影响,再写对家长或亲子关系的影响。
老师处理:老师建议把“孩子年纪小、价值观没有形成”放在前面,再写与家长关系变疏远。
学生原始输出:感情变得生疏;年纪太小的时候价值观没有形成
老师示范 / 修改方向:When children are too young to form stable values, living away from parents may make them more vulnerable to negative influence. It may also weaken the bond between parents and children.
复习抓手:bond 是“纽带、关系连接”。;教育题的逻辑顺序通常是孩子优先,家长其次。;写坏处时也要按照重要性和直接性排序。
课堂推进:老师讲解负面结果不要写得太极端。可以说孩子可能受到负面影响,但不要直接写到犯罪、吸毒、危害社会等过度具体和失真的结果。
老师处理:老师用“过马路不看路会被车撞”和“住校后会吸毒、犯罪”的例子,说明负面结果发生需要前提,不能跳过论证。
学生原始输出:受到不良习惯;危害社会
老师示范 / 修改方向:Some young students may be negatively influenced by their peers, especially when teachers cannot supervise every student closely.
复习抓手:负面论证要柔和、宽泛、可信。;不要把低概率结果写成必然结果。;如果要写同伴影响,需要补出前提:老师人数有限,无法充分监督每个学生。
课堂推进:老师给出另一种文章结构:短期写价值观未形成和亲子关系变淡,长期写孩子可能变得千篇一律,不利于未来发展。
老师处理:老师肯定“孩子没有个性、未来发展受影响”的点,并解释它和前一个坏处形成递进关系。
学生原始输出:孩子没有个性
老师示范 / 修改方向:In the short term, young children may be affected by others and become emotionally distant from parents. In the long term, they may become similar to one another, which can limit their individuality and future development.
复习抓手:可以按“短期影响”和“长期影响”组织论证。;individuality 是“个性、独特性”。;递进论证可以先承认前一个理由未必总成立,再推出另一个更稳的理由。
课堂推进:老师开始看 Rice 同学的快时尚 fast fashion(快时尚)作文思路,整体评价很高,认为逻辑具体、清楚,并补充了一些可尝试写出的高级语料。
老师处理:老师指出 Rice 的思路具体但没有具体到失真,尤其是环境污染部分能区分直接污染和间接污染。
老师示范 / 修改方向:Fast fashion may use synthetic materials, which are non-natural and difficult to degrade. It may also encourage rapid consumption, creating large amounts of waste.
复习抓手:synthetic materials 是“人工合成材料”。;degrade 是“降解”。;直接污染:材料本身不可降解、造成污染。;间接污染:快消费带来大量垃圾。
课堂推进:老师进一步表扬 Rice 的作文上下段对应清楚:前面写不环保材料造成污染,后面就写环保材料、可降解、可回收、不污染,逻辑一一对应。
老师处理:老师解释 Rice 的同意和不同意部分能形成对应关系,并补充环保 lifestyle(生活方式)和循环利用的表达方向。
学生原始输出:会宣传这种就是为了让你去买更多的东西
老师示范 / 修改方向:Some brands may use recyclable or biodegradable materials and encourage a more environmentally friendly lifestyle, such as recycling old clothes instead of throwing them away.
复习抓手:biodegradable 是“可生物降解的”。;recyclable 是“可回收的”。;lifestyle 是“生活方式”。;正反段落要保持论证顺序一致。
课堂推进:学生提出品牌回收旧衣可能只是为了卖更多新衣服。老师回应说,这取决于品牌回收后如何处理衣服;写作时要看自己想论证到哪里,支撑观点后就可以停。
老师处理:老师承认学生的反向思考有可能成立,但提醒写作中要控制论证范围,不要无限延伸。
学生原始输出:为了让你去买更多的东西...到时候这些东西就被他们无情丢弃在海里
老师示范 / 修改方向:This depends on how companies deal with the collected clothes. If they truly recycle them, the practice may reduce waste; if not, the benefit may be limited.
复习抓手:反向思考可以有,但要服务于自己的立场。;论证到足够支持观点的位置即可,不必无限展开。;快时尚回收是否环保,取决于回收后的处理方式。
课堂推进:老师用同学的素食 vegetarian(素食)题目讲解:高分思路需要具体但可靠的科学细节,例如维生素 B12、蛋白质、谷物、坚果等。
老师处理:老师肯定这种带有科学细节的思路,并提醒学生可以提前背一些可迁移词汇。
学生原始输出:我感觉我好像思路写的太少
老师示范 / 修改方向:Although a vegetarian diet can support survival, people may still need to pay attention to nutrients such as vitamin B12, protein, grains, nuts, fruits and vegetables.
复习抓手:vegetarian 是“素食者/素食的”。;protein 是“蛋白质”。;grain 是“谷物”。;nuts 是“坚果”。;vitamin 是“维生素”。;there is no necessity for meat consumption 表示“没有必要吃肉”。
课堂推进:老师讲解历史遗迹 historic sites(历史遗迹)题目时提醒:保护历史遗迹最直接的好处通常是经济收益,再写民族认同等精神价值。
老师处理:老师指出不要先写虚的好处,应先写 tourism income(旅游收入)等经济角度,再写 national identity(国家认同)。
学生原始输出:保护历史遗迹让我们为中国文化骄傲
老师示范 / 修改方向:The protection of historic sites can first bring tourism revenue. More importantly, it may strengthen national identity rather than only create national pride.
复习抓手:tourism revenue 是“旅游收入”。;national identity 是“国家认同”。;national pride 是“民族自豪感”,但有时不如 national identity 准确。;写好处时先写最直接、最重要的利益。
课堂推进:老师继续讲历史遗迹不一定都要保护的理由,可以写保护困难、不可行,并辨析 feasible、viable、practical 等词。
老师处理:老师纠正“不可行”的表达,提醒 not feasible、not viable、impractical 更贴近“难以做到”。
学生原始输出:不可行怎么说?
老师示范 / 修改方向:In some cases, the protection of historic sites may be impractical, not feasible, or not viable because it requires too many resources.
复习抓手:feasible 是“可行的”。;viable 是“可实施、可行的”。;practical 是“实际可操作的”。;not available 不是“不可行”,不要混用。
课堂推进:老师用博物馆文物是否归还的题目提醒大家:写国际类、文化遗产类题目时不要过于针对具体国家或具体文物,要保持思辨性。
老师处理:老师举例说明,如果只从单一国家立场强烈表达,很容易缺少思辨性;可以改写成发达国家、发展中国家、文明古国等更宽泛的表达。
学生原始输出:对于我们中国来说其实蛮有必要的但对于美国来说其实没什么用
老师示范 / 修改方向:When discussing cultural relics, it is safer to use broader categories such as developed countries, developing countries, or ancient civilizations, and to consider both preservation and ownership.
复习抓手:文化遗产类题目要避免过度针对某个国家。;保持双边思考,不要只写情绪化立场。;可以用 developed countries(发达国家)、developing countries(发展中国家)、ancient civilizations(文明古国)来概括。
Rice同学的快时尚作文思路整体获得老师高度肯定,老师表示“没有任何修改意见”。
Rice同学的环境污染论证能分出直接污染和间接污染,逻辑层次清楚。
Rice同学的正反两段能做到一一对应:前面写不环保材料,后面就写环保材料、可降解、可回收、不污染。
课堂重点训练了“具体但不失真”的写法:要有细节,但不能写成低概率、过度极端的结果。
老师补充了 synthetic materials(人工合成材料)、biodegradable(可生物降解的)、recyclable(可回收的)、national identity(国家认同)等可迁移表达。
会宣传这种就是为了让你去买更多的东西
到时候这些东西就被他们无情丢弃在海里
我感觉我好像思路写的太少
以下为按课堂已讲方向整理的课后复习改进版,围绕 Rice 同学课堂中被重点点评的快时尚 fast fashion(快时尚)题目展开,重点保留老师讲到的直接污染、间接污染、环保材料、循环利用和环保生活方式等论证方向。
Fast fashion has become increasingly common in many countries. Some people believe that this trend is harmful to the environment, while others argue that it may also bring certain benefits. In my view, although fast fashion can sometimes encourage environmentally friendly practices, its negative impact on the environment is still more serious.
One major problem is that fast fashion often relies on synthetic materials. These materials are not natural, so they are usually difficult to degrade after being thrown away. As a result, they may remain in the environment for a long time and create pollution. In addition, fast fashion encourages people to buy clothes more frequently. When consumers keep replacing old clothes with new ones, a large amount of waste is produced. This means that fast fashion can damage the environment not only through the materials it uses, but also through the wasteful lifestyle it promotes.
However, it is also true that some fashion brands are trying to reduce this problem. For example, they may use recyclable or biodegradable materials, which are less harmful to the environment. Some brands also encourage customers to return old clothes instead of throwing them away. If these clothes are truly recycled, this practice may help reduce waste and promote a more environmentally friendly lifestyle.
Overall, fast fashion may have some positive possibilities, especially when companies use greener materials and support recycling. However, because it still encourages rapid consumption and creates large amounts of waste, I believe its disadvantages outweigh its advantages.
| 原句问题 | 推荐表达 | 记忆方法 |
|---|---|---|
| 寄宿学校减少接送,所以减少环境污染 | 教育类话题应优先回到学生学习和成长。 | |
| 危害社会 | 过度具体的负面结果容易失真,削弱说服力。 | |
| 先写亲子关系,再写孩子价值观 | 教育话题通常孩子优先,家长其次。 | |
| 民族荣誉感 | 历史遗迹不仅带来自豪,也让人认同自己的文化根源。 | |
| not available | available 更偏“可获得”,不是“方案可行”。 |
雅思大作文课后复习改进版 课堂没有逐字呈现 Rice 完整最终定稿;此版本为基于课堂实际讲解方向整理的复习版。
Fast fashion has become increasingly common in many countries. Some people believe that this trend is harmful to the environment, while others argue that it may also bring certain benefits. In my view, although fast fashion can sometimes encourage environmentally friendly practices, its negative impact on the environment is still more serious.
One major problem is that fast fashion often relies on synthetic materials. These materials are not natural, so they are usually difficult to degrade after being thrown away. As a result, they may remain in the environment for a long time and create pollution. In addition, fast fashion encourages people to buy clothes more frequently. When consumers keep replacing old clothes with new ones, a large amount of waste is produced. This means that fast fashion can damage the environment not only through the materials it uses, but also through the wasteful lifestyle it promotes.
However, it is also true that some fashion brands are trying to reduce this problem. For example, they may use recyclable or biodegradable materials, which are less harmful to the environment. Some brands also encourage customers to return old clothes instead of throwing them away. If these clothes are truly recycled, this practice may help reduce waste and promote a more environmentally friendly lifestyle.
Overall, fast fashion may have some positive possibilities, especially when companies use greener materials and support recycling. However, because it still encourages rapid consumption and creates large amounts of waste, I believe its disadvantages outweigh its advantages.