按课堂已讲方向整理的课后复习改进版,重点对应本节课开头讲解的教育类 Discuss both views 题。课堂没有形成完整最终定稿,因此以下为基于课堂审题和表达方向整理的复习版。
In many countries, governments spend a large amount of public money on the education of young people. Some people, however, argue that adults who cannot read or write should also receive more public funding. In my view, both groups deserve support, but basic education for young people should remain the main priority, while adult literacy programmes should be funded as a necessary supplement.
It is justifiable to give priority to young people because they are still at the stage where education can shape their basic abilities and future choices. If children and teenagers receive proper schooling, they are more likely to acquire literacy, basic numeracy and social skills before entering adult life. This can prevent them from becoming adults who cannot read or write in the first place. Therefore, funding education for young people is not only useful for individual development, but also a long-term way to reduce social problems.
At the same time, it is also important to support adults who cannot read or write. These adults may have missed formal schooling when they were young, and a lack of literacy can seriously limit their job opportunities and daily independence. For example, they may struggle to read public notices, fill in forms or communicate in writing at work. Public money spent on adult literacy classes can help them regain basic dignity and participate more fully in society.
Overall, the two forms of education should not be treated as completely separate choices. The government should continue to invest heavily in young people's education, because it prevents future literacy problems. However, adults who have already missed this opportunity should also receive targeted support, especially through practical literacy programmes.