练过的材料
- Boarding school 趋势题(大作文思路讲解)
- Fast fashion 环保题(大作文思路讲解)
- Vegetarian diet 素食题(词汇与细节积累)
- Historical buildings / artifacts 历史遗迹与文物题(大作文思路讲解)
写作 · 2026-06-17
本节写作课围绕 IELTS 大作文的立场、论证顺序、理由距离、负面结果分寸和高分词汇展开,重点训练如何把思路写得具体但不失真。
课堂推进:课堂先讨论 boarding school(寄宿学校)越来越流行是否是积极趋势。老师提醒:如果题目问“是不是积极趋势”,可以写“确实有好处,但坏处更多,所以不能算积极趋势”。
老师处理:老师讲解 more and more 类趋势题可以写弊大于利,并示范如何表达让步和反驳。
老师示范 / 修改方向:可以写:它确实有一些好处,但不能被称为积极趋势,因为坏处比好处更多。
复习抓手:趋势题看到 more and more(越来越多)时,可以优先考虑弊大于利;否定一个趋势不是说它完全没有好处,而是说明坏处更多;立场要清楚:有好处,但不是好事
课堂推进:老师指出,把寄宿学校和环境污染、交通压力直接联系起来,逻辑走得太远。教育类话题应优先写对孩子学习和成长的影响。
老师处理:老师把“减少环境污染”改成更贴近教育话题的“节省通勤时间,从而用于睡眠、学习或兴趣拓展”。
学生原始输出:因为是寄宿学校所以就工作日不用车接车送于是就减少了环境污染
老师示范 / 修改方向:更合适的方向:boarding school 可以节省 daily commuting(每日通勤)时间,这些时间可以用来补觉、学习,或拓展兴趣。
复习抓手:教育类作文先往孩子和教育效果上写;不要把理由绕到太远的话题,比如交通或环境;commuting 是通勤,指从家到学校或工作地点的往返路程
课堂推进:老师认可“寄宿学校能帮助忙碌家长减少照顾压力”这个角度,但提醒它应排在孩子受益之后。
老师处理:老师讲解家长角度可以作为第二层理由,并补充 strike balance between work and family(平衡工作和家庭)这个表达。
老师示范 / 修改方向:家长很忙时,boarding school 可以减少家长日常照顾压力,让家长更容易 strike balance between work and family(平衡工作和家庭)。
复习抓手:教育类话题中,孩子角度通常优先于家长角度;家长角度可以写,但不要放在最前面;strike balance between work and family 表示平衡工作和家庭
课堂推进:老师指出,坏处段也应先写对孩子的影响,再写对家长或亲子关系的影响。比如先写孩子价值观尚未形成,再写亲子关系变疏远。
老师处理:老师重新梳理论证顺序:孩子优先,家长其次;也可以按短期和长期影响组织。
学生原始输出:他的感情变得生疏
老师示范 / 修改方向:更合理的顺序:先写孩子年龄小、价值观没有完全形成,可能受到负面影响;再写长期住校可能让亲子 bond(情感纽带)变弱。
复习抓手:教育话题的坏处段也要孩子优先;bond 是情感纽带;论证顺序可以按对象:孩子再家长,也可以按时间:短期再长期
课堂推进:老师提醒,写寄宿学校的负面影响时,不要直接写到犯罪、吸毒、危害社会等极端结果。更稳妥的写法是:孩子可能受到周围人的负面影响,而且影响较深远。
老师处理:老师用“过马路看路”和“寄宿学校导致吸毒”等例子说明负面结果需要概率和前提,不能滑坡推理。
学生原始输出:受到不良习惯...危害社会
老师示范 / 修改方向:可以写:孩子年龄小、价值观尚未形成,离开父母日常引导后,在老师人数有限的情况下,可能受到周围人的负面影响。
复习抓手:负面结果不要写得太具体、太极端;滑坡逻辑会削弱说服力;写负面影响时要补足前提,例如老师人数有限、父母引导减少
课堂推进:老师强调,雅思大作文讨论的是普遍现象,不是某一个具体学校或个案。因此例子可以支持逻辑,但不要具体到失真。
老师处理:老师解释为什么过于具体的例子不能代表所有寄宿学校,并建议用更宽泛、更普适的表达。
学生原始输出:染头发呀吸烟啊...盗窃呀
老师示范 / 修改方向:不要具体列举“吸烟、盗窃”等个案,可以概括为 negative influences(负面影响)或 unhealthy habits(不良习惯)。
复习抓手:雅思作文要讨论普遍性结论;具体例子不能替代普遍逻辑;负面内容越具体,越容易显得失真
课堂推进:老师认可“寄宿学校可能让孩子变得千篇一律,影响未来发展”这个角度,并建议它可以和价值观影响一起放到孩子影响部分。
老师处理:老师说明这个点好在它能和前一个坏处形成递进:即使没有坏习惯,所有人都过于相似也未必好。
学生原始输出:孩子没有个性
老师示范 / 修改方向:可以写:即使寄宿学校中的学生都表现很好,统一的生活和管理也可能让学生变得过于相似,限制个性和未来发展。
复习抓手:同一段内的理由可以形成递进;可以用“即使前一个坏处不存在,仍然有另一个问题”的方式增强说服力;个性发展也是教育话题中贴近孩子的理由
课堂推进:课堂接着讨论 fast fashion(快时尚)和环保。老师认可一个思路:快时尚可能使用 synthetic materials(人工合成材料),这些材料不易降解,会造成环境负担。
老师处理:老师拆解快时尚污染段的逻辑:先讲材料本身,再讲无法自然降解和形成污染。
老师示范 / 修改方向:可以写 synthetic materials(人工合成材料)are not biodegradable(不可降解的),so they may create environmental burden and pollution(环境负担和污染)。
复习抓手:fast fashion 是快时尚;synthetic materials 是人工合成材料;biodegradable 是可降解的;not biodegradable 是不可降解的;具体但不失真的科学细节能增强论证
课堂推进:老师进一步讲解,快时尚污染可以分成直接污染和间接污染:材料本身造成污染是直接的;快速消费产生大量垃圾是间接的。
老师处理:老师肯定了先讲直接污染、再讲间接污染的顺序。
老师示范 / 修改方向:直接污染:材料不可降解。间接污染:快消费带来大量 waste(垃圾),垃圾又造成污染。
复习抓手:论证可以分直接影响和间接影响;同一段内部也要有清楚顺序;waste 是垃圾、废弃物
课堂推进:老师指出,如果上一段说材料不可降解、会污染,下一段反方就可以对应写环保材料、可回收材料和环保生活方式。
老师处理:老师讲解上下段逻辑要一致,不能上一段先孩子后家长,下一段突然反过来。
老师示范 / 修改方向:可对应写 recyclable(可回收的)、biodegradable(可降解的)、non-polluting(不污染的)materials,并补充 brands may promote an eco-friendly lifestyle(环保生活方式)。
复习抓手:正反两段最好一一对应;recyclable 是可回收的;eco-friendly lifestyle 是环保生活方式;上下段逻辑顺序要一致
课堂推进:老师讲到 vegetarian diet(素食饮食)相关作文时,提醒同学可以积累维生素、蛋白质、谷物、坚果等具体词汇,用科学细节支撑论点。
老师处理:老师提到 vitamin B12(维生素B12)、osteoporosis(骨质疏松)、nuts(坚果)、protein(蛋白质)、grain(谷物)等词汇和内容方向。
学生原始输出:我感觉我好像思路写的太少
老师示范 / 修改方向:可以背一些基础细节,例如 nuts(坚果)、protein(蛋白质)、grain(谷物)、vitamin(维生素),用于支撑素食是否健康、是否需要肉类等观点。
复习抓手:科学类细节可以提前积累;细节要服务于自己的观点;there is no necessity for meat consumption 表示没有必要吃肉
课堂推进:老师讲到保护历史遗迹时,提醒同学先写更直接、更重要的好处:促进经济和旅游收入;再写 national identity(国家认同)。
老师处理:老师纠正“民族荣誉感”的表达,建议用 national identity,而不是只写 national pride。
学生原始输出:集体荣誉感 / 民族荣誉感
老师示范 / 修改方向:更推荐 national identity(国家认同),因为历史不仅带来自豪感,也让人和自己的文化、国家产生认同。
复习抓手:保护历史遗迹的直接好处可以先写旅游和经济;national pride 是国家自豪感;national identity 是国家认同,更适合表达历史和文化归属
课堂推进:老师讲到有些历史遗迹不一定都能保护,因为保护成本高、执行困难。这里可以用 feasible、viable、practical 等词表达“可行”。
老师处理:老师区分 feasible、viable、practical,并提醒不要误用 available。
学生原始输出:available
老师示范 / 修改方向:这里应说 not feasible(不可行)、not viable(不可行/难以持续)或 impractical(不实际),不要说 not available。
复习抓手:feasible 是可行的;viable 是可行的、能持续的;practical 是实际的;available 是可获得的,不适合表达“不可行”
课堂推进:老师用文物归还类题目提醒大家:不要把作文写成针对某一个国家或某一个博物馆的情绪表达。应保持思辨性,写更普遍的国家类型和逻辑。
老师处理:老师提醒可以写“发达国家、发展中国家、文明古国”等更宽泛对象,也要写反方的合理性。
学生原始输出:大英博物馆里我中华的文物有列一大堆都得给我还回来
老师示范 / 修改方向:更稳妥的写法:some developed countries(一些发达国家)和 developing countries(发展中国家)之间可能存在文物归还争议,但也要考虑保护、展览和国际知名度等反方理由。
复习抓手:作文不要把对象写得过于具体、过于针对;议论文需要思辨性,不能只表达情绪;可以用国家类型替代具体国家或博物馆
学习了 boarding school(寄宿学校)趋势题的基本立场:有好处,但坏处更多,所以不一定是积极趋势。
明确教育类话题要优先写孩子和教育效果,不要把理由绕到环境污染、交通压力等太远的话题。
练习了如何把负面影响写得稳妥:可以写 negative influences(负面影响),不要直接跳到犯罪、吸毒、危害社会等极端结果。
学习了 fast fashion(快时尚)作文中直接污染、间接污染和环保材料的对应写法。
积累了 national identity(国家认同)、feasible(可行的)、viable(可行的/能持续的)、synthetic materials(人工合成材料)等写作词汇。
因为是寄宿学校所以就工作日不用车接车送于是就减少了环境污染
他的感情变得生疏
受到不良习惯...危害社会
集体荣誉感 / 民族荣誉感
available
按课堂已讲方向整理的课后复习改进版,重点使用本节课讲过的寄宿学校题目思路:有好处,但弊大于利;理由按孩子优先、再到家长和长期发展的顺序展开。
In recent years, boarding schools have become increasingly popular in many countries. Although this trend may bring some benefits, I do not think it should be seen as a positive development, because its disadvantages are greater.
Admittedly, boarding schools can save students a lot of commuting time. Without daily commuting, students may have more time to rest, study or take part in extracurricular activities. This can be helpful for their learning efficiency. In addition, boarding schools may also reduce parents' daily pressure, especially when parents find it difficult to strike a balance between work and family.
However, the main concern is that many children are still too young to form stable values. When they live away from their parents for a long time, they may receive less daily guidance from their families. Although teachers can manage students at school, they cannot give enough attention to every child all the time. As a result, some students may be affected by negative influences around them, and these influences may last for a long time.
Another problem is that boarding schools may weaken the bond between parents and children. If children spend most of their time at school and rarely communicate with their parents in daily life, the parent-child relationship may become less close. This emotional distance can be harmful to children's development.
Finally, even if students in boarding schools all develop good habits, a highly similar living and learning environment may make them less individual. If students are trained in the same way for a long time, they may become too similar to each other, which is not ideal for their future development.
In conclusion, boarding schools do have some practical benefits, such as saving commuting time and reducing parents' pressure. However, because they may bring risks to children's values, family relationships and individuality, I believe this trend is more negative than positive.
| 原句问题 | 推荐表达 | 记忆方法 |
|---|---|---|
| 寄宿学校减少车接车送,所以减少环境污染 | 教育类话题要优先回到孩子和教育本身。 | |
| 先写家长或亲子关系,再写孩子影响 | 教育话题中孩子是最核心对象。 | |
| 危害社会 | 过度具体和极端会显得失真。 | |
| available 表达不可行 | available 表示可获得,不表示可行。 |
IELTS Writing Task 2 课后复习改进版 课堂未出现完整最终定稿,以下为按课堂已讲方向整理的改进版
In recent years, boarding schools have become increasingly popular in many countries. Although this trend may bring some benefits, I do not think it should be seen as a positive development, because its disadvantages are greater.
Admittedly, boarding schools can save students a lot of commuting time. Without daily commuting, students may have more time to rest, study or take part in extracurricular activities. This can be helpful for their learning efficiency. In addition, boarding schools may also reduce parents' daily pressure, especially when parents find it difficult to strike a balance between work and family.
However, the main concern is that many children are still too young to form stable values. When they live away from their parents for a long time, they may receive less daily guidance from their families. Although teachers can manage students at school, they cannot give enough attention to every child all the time. As a result, some students may be affected by negative influences around them, and these influences may last for a long time.
Another problem is that boarding schools may weaken the bond between parents and children. If children spend most of their time at school and rarely communicate with their parents in daily life, the parent-child relationship may become less close. This emotional distance can be harmful to children's development.
Finally, even if students in boarding schools all develop good habits, a highly similar living and learning environment may make them less individual. If students are trained in the same way for a long time, they may become too similar to each other, which is not ideal for their future development.
In conclusion, boarding schools do have some practical benefits, such as saving commuting time and reducing parents' pressure. However, because they may bring risks to children's values, family relationships and individuality, I believe this trend is more negative than positive.