练过的材料
- 渔船规模对比表格题(雅思写作 Task 1 表格题):用于讲解表格题如何按收入相关指标和成本相关指标分段,并写出大船更有利可图的 overview。
- 表格题范文(课堂范文):用于示范开头段、overview、收入段、成本段和六点五分水平表达。
- 下午大作文提纲任务(写作提纲任务):已经写完表格小作文的同学课后继续完成下午大作文提纲。
- 地图题小作文(雅思写作 Task 1 地图题):作为有时间时的额外写作练习,下午会讲地图题怎么写。
写作 · 2026-06-24
雅思写作小作文表格题:按收入和成本组织数据,写出盈利判断,并积累六分到七分的表达替换
课堂推进:课堂先讲了写作六分的底线:小作文和大作文都要写够最低字数,内容要尽量保证正确。老师说明,偶发拼写错误如果机器能识别出原词,一般问题不大,但反复拼错会被认为是真的不会。
老师处理:老师用 this 被误拼成 thsi 的例子解释机器评分如何判断偶发拼写错误,并强调拼写、语法、搭配都要写自己会的内容。
老师示范 / 修改方向:老师提醒:只写自己会写且能写对的表达;拼写、语法、搭配任何一项出错,都会影响正确性。
复习抓手:写作先保证字数过线;偶发拼写错误和反复拼错不同;只写自己能写对的表达
课堂推进:老师讲解了六分、6.5分和七分之间的核心差别:六分可以用两种正确表达反复交替;七分需要更多正确替换;6.5分是尝试更多替换但出现部分错误。
老师处理:老师用 rose dramatically、rose significantly、grew dramatically、experienced a dramatic growth 等例子说明词汇、词性和语法层面的替换。
老师示范 / 修改方向:rose dramatically → rose significantly / grew dramatically / grew significantly / experienced a dramatic growth
复习抓手:六分重点是正确;七分重点是正确且有变化;替换可以换动词、副词、词性或句型
课堂推进:老师带大家整理动态图常见表达:上升、下降、保持不变,以及大幅和小幅变化的副词。课堂反复强调每一类尽量准备三个正确表达。
老师处理:老师列举上升、下降、保持不变的动词、名词和副词替换,并说明三个表达能帮助冲击更高分。
学生原始输出:学生参与回答:declined, decrease, fall 等下降表达。
老师示范 / 修改方向:上升:rise / grow / increase;名词:a rise / a growth / an increase;大幅:dramatically / significantly / considerably;小幅:slightly / minimally;下降:decline / decrease / fall;保持不变:remain unchanged / maintain unchanged / stay unchanged
复习抓手:每个常用功能表达至少准备三个;动词和名词都要会;保持不变也可以替换表达
课堂推进:课堂进入本节表格题范文。老师讲开头段可以用 illustrate 替换题目表达,也可以用 comparative 表示比较类图表;according to 可以替换成 in terms of、regarding、concerning 等。
老师处理:老师展示范文开头,并讲解 according to four indicators 与 in terms of 的替换关系。
老师示范 / 修改方向:according to → in terms of / regarding / concerning / with regard to / in respect of / based on
复习抓手:开头段可以改写题目语言;in terms of 表示“关于、就某方面而言”;同类连接词要能替换使用
课堂推进:老师引导学生观察这道表格题和普通表格的区别:不同指标单位不一样,所以不能简单流水账比较,而要重新归类。课堂把数据分为收入相关和成本相关两组。
老师处理:老师提问 Lucas 表格特点,并进一步解释人数、年捕捞量、成本、油耗等单位不同,因此要围绕 profit(利润)来组织。
学生原始输出:Lucas回答大意:单位不同。
老师示范 / 修改方向:profit = income - costs;收入相关:annual catch;成本相关:员工数量、每人成本、油耗。
复习抓手:单位不同的表格不能只逐项比大小;可以按收入和成本重组信息;利润等于收入减成本
课堂推进:老师讲解 overview 只需要写最概括的结论:大船整体更有利可图。由于数据不完整、估算不精确,可以使用 tend to do 这类缓和表达。
老师处理:老师解释 profitable、profit、income、costs 和 tend to be more profitable,并说明为什么这里适合使用 hedging words(缓和表达)。
学生原始输出:学生曾把 tend to do 理解为“试图去做”。
老师示范 / 修改方向:tend to do 不是“试图做”,而是“倾向于”;Large-scale vessels tend to be more profitable than small-scale vessels.
复习抓手:overview 不需要写细节数据;more 后面要说明比较对象;数据不完整时可用 tend to 这种缓和表达
课堂推进:老师说明这道题的数据存在缺口:捕捞量没有鱼的单价,油耗没有油价,因此只能估算收入和成本,不能精确计算利润。
老师处理:老师用 price × amount 解释收入需要单价和数量,用油耗例子解释成本也需要油价。
学生原始输出:学生参与回答:收入还与价格、质量等有关。
老师示范 / 修改方向:income = price × amount / number / sales;油费不能只看 gallons,还要看 fuel price。
复习抓手:捕捞量不等于收入;油耗不等于油费;数据缺失时要避免绝对化判断
课堂推进:老师讲主体第一段可以写收入相关指标。大船在人类食用捕捞量上高于小船,并且只有大船有工业加工捕捞量,因此收入潜力更高。
老师处理:老师示范 generate higher revenue、annual catch、human consumption、industrial processing 等表达,并说明 only 的用法。
学生原始输出:学生对老师提问“收入项是第几行数据”一度不确定。
老师示范 / 修改方向:Large-scale vessels generate higher revenue. This can be seen from their larger annual catch for human consumption, 29 million tons compared to 24 million tons, and only large-scale vessels provide annual catch for industrial processing.
复习抓手:generate higher revenue 可以替换 earn more / make more money;only 表示另一边没有,不必再写 zero;小作文重点是有逻辑地读数据,不是做数学题
课堂推进:老师讲成本段需要处理支持和反向数据。员工总数少支持“大船更盈利”,但每人年成本更高、油耗更多会削弱这个判断,所以要用 though、while、despite 等让步词连接。
老师处理:老师带学生判断员工数量、每人成本和油耗分别是支持还是推翻“大船更盈利”的结论。
学生原始输出:学生回答中能判断第一行员工数量支持结论;对油耗是否支持一度不确定。
老师示范 / 修改方向:because 用于支持结论的数据;though / although / while / despite 用于反向数据。
复习抓手:支持结论的数据可用 because 衔接;反向数据要用让步词处理;成本可以分为 labor cost 和 fuel cost
课堂推进:老师重点训练把 although / though 引导的完整句子改成 despite + 名词结构,使表达更简洁、更学术。
老师处理:老师要求学生把 Though large-scale commercial ships have a higher annual cost per capita 改成 Despite 开头,并讲解 despite 后面接名词。
学生原始输出:学生尝试把句子改成名词结构,课堂中出现了 higher cost / oil consumption 等关键词。
老师示范 / 修改方向:Though large-scale commercial ships have a higher annual cost per capita → Despite the higher annual cost per capita of large-scale commercial ships. While each large-scale vessel consumes more oil → Despite higher oil consumption of large-scale vessels.
复习抓手:despite 后面接名词,不接完整句子;名词结构通常比动词句更简洁;把动词变成名词是提分方法之一
课堂推进:老师讲了比较数据时的细节:想强调大数真的大,可以用大数的下限和小数的上限对比;还讲了 discrepancy、difference、that of 等表达。
老师处理:老师解释 at least 25,000 pounds compared to at most 3,000 pounds 的比较技巧,以及 over eighty times、ten times、that of labor costs 的指代关系。
学生原始输出:Jason回答 that 指代 ten times,老师进一步说明语法上 that 指代前面的 difference。
老师示范 / 修改方向:that of labor costs 中 that 指代 difference;discrepancy 可以替换 difference。
复习抓手:强调差距时可用下限对上限;discrepancy 表示差距;that of 可以指代前文单数名词
课堂推进:最后老师让同学们复述本节课的替换表达,并布置课后任务:把这篇表格小作文写出来;已经写完的同学继续写下午的大作文提纲,有时间再写地图题小作文。
老师处理:老师逐个点名让学生复述 in terms of 的替换、compared to / versus、difference / discrepancy 等表达,并明确课后写作任务。
学生原始输出:Jason原始输出片段:difference;尝试拼 discrepancy 时说出类似 “Disgrapncy e i s ...” 的错误拼写。
老师示范 / 修改方向:difference → discrepancy;compared to / as compared to / versus;in terms of / in respect of / regarding / with regard to / concerning
复习抓手:课后要把表格作文完整写出来;替换表达需要课后背熟;已完成表格作文的同学写下午大作文提纲
本节课先明确写作六分底线:字数要够,表达要写对,偶发拼写错误可以接受,但反复拼错会影响评分。
课堂重点讲了六分、6.5分、七分的区别:六分用少量正确表达,七分需要更多正确替换,6.5分是尝试替换但仍有错误。
表格题分析不按数据顺序流水账,而是按 profit(利润)= income(收入)- costs(成本)的逻辑重组。
老师带学生把 although / while 的完整句升级成 despite + 名词,让表达更简洁、更适合写作。
课后任务是完成这篇表格小作文;已经完成的同学继续写下午大作文提纲。
单位不是
试图去做
In respect to
不是吧我这讲半天不知道我在啊什么
ten times
Disgrapncy e i s ... P A N Z
按课堂已讲方向整理的课后复习改进版;题目具体表格标题和全部原始数据在逐字稿中未完整出现,因此只使用课堂明确讲到的数据和逻辑。
The table illustrates a comparison between large-scale commercial vessels and small-scale boats in terms of several indicators related to fishing.
Overall, large-scale commercial vessels tend to be more profitable than small-scale boats, although some of their costs are higher.
Regarding income-related indicators, large-scale vessels appear to generate higher revenue. This can be seen from their larger annual catch for human consumption, at 29 million tons compared to 24 million tons for small-scale boats. More importantly, only large-scale commercial vessels provide annual catch for industrial processing, which further supports the view that they have stronger income potential.
Turning to costs, the fishing industry's expenses mainly consist of labor and fuel. Despite the higher annual cost per capita of large-scale commercial vessels, at at least 25,000 pounds compared with at most 3,000 pounds for small-scale boats, they employ much fewer crew members. The discrepancy in crew numbers is so large as over eighty times, which suggests that their total labor cost may still be lower. Despite higher oil consumption of large-scale vessels, the difference in fuel use is only about ten times, much less than that of labor cost. Thus, large-scale fishing is still more cost-efficient overall.
| 原句问题 | 推荐表达 | 记忆方法 |
|---|---|---|
IELTS Writing Task 1 table essay review_version_based_on_class_instruction_not_full_final_draft
The table illustrates a comparison between large-scale commercial vessels and small-scale boats in terms of several indicators related to fishing.
Overall, large-scale commercial vessels tend to be more profitable than small-scale boats, although some of their costs are higher.
Regarding income-related indicators, large-scale vessels appear to generate higher revenue. This can be seen from their larger annual catch for human consumption, at 29 million tons compared to 24 million tons for small-scale boats. More importantly, only large-scale commercial vessels provide annual catch for industrial processing, which further supports the view that they have stronger income potential.
Turning to costs, the fishing industry's expenses mainly consist of labor and fuel. Despite the higher annual cost per capita of large-scale commercial vessels, at at least 25,000 pounds compared with at most 3,000 pounds for small-scale boats, they employ much fewer crew members. The discrepancy in crew numbers is so large as over eighty times, which suggests that their total labor cost may still be lower. Despite higher oil consumption of large-scale vessels, the difference in fuel use is only about ten times, much less than that of labor cost. Thus, large-scale fishing is still more cost-efficient overall.